@Big guy: OK, first I wanna reply that I didn't claim Lilly is 6k, as far as I onow she's 5.5k.
@Martina: I'm not afraid of reality, it's just that I don't think most women (besides maybe the top 2) are actually competing so much as to fake their inplant size. And if they were to go to such lengts (for whichever reason) they could easily falsify every self performed test of self provided proof. So in my opinion there won't be any difference except the false feeling of undeniable proven sizes.
Besides the fact that it does intrigue me a bit, I don't understand why this matters as much anyways, but I guess I'm not the kind of guy who cares as much. I mean I love numbers and for that reason alone would choose 1000cc over 950cc altho I would never see the difference, but these women are positively huge, and with the slow leaking saline implants do, akd the many fills, the number is a approximation amyways.
@Indy: These are spherical object tho, so all your comparisons only give a SENSE of scale, and are in no way definitive. Look at for instance Allegra who has tons of projection, but not a lot of circumference. Or Bunny who had lots of coverage but less projection. Even getting multiple angles it would still be very hard to compare. 3D scanning would make it possible, but is taking things over the top. The water displacement test would be the next best thing imo, but why would anyone go through with it besides for fun? They have nothing to prove... Also someone who wants to fake the results could very easily to so, unless performed by a neutral party, and I mean: Come on...