Author Topic: Nicolette Shea  (Read 1443219 times)

chris51o

  • Explicit-Users
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 66
  • -Receive: 413
  • Posts: 130
Re: Nicolette Shea
« Reply #555 on: April 17, 2017, 08:43:27 am »
Fuck she's amazing. Best tits in porn at the moment. Ready to see some sets of her in that bikini. Also ready to see her get banged out by someone besides that Keiran Lee.  She's blonde plastic perfection.

I agree. I'd like to see Voodoo or Chris Strokes with her in a scene

Goodeye

  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 9691
  • -Receive: 247641
  • Posts: 33026
Re: Nicolette Shea
« Reply #556 on: April 17, 2017, 12:58:53 pm »


Vern091

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 3335
  • -Receive: 1985
  • Posts: 1622
  • Ha Ha Ha Ha We love these Hoes
Re: Nicolette Shea
« Reply #557 on: April 17, 2017, 07:47:39 pm »
It's basically up to her how big she wants s to be. The cartoon body and face are all there. Plus she's showing signs of attitude to take the filth to the next level. Interested to see who she shoots with in Europe. I'd like to see her with Hard x, Jules Jordan or evil angel studios. We really need an oil scene.

robyncream

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 81
  • -Receive: 6
  • Posts: 6
Re: Nicolette Shea
« Reply #558 on: April 18, 2017, 03:46:44 pm »
perfect ass




The Kid

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 69
  • -Receive: 159
  • Posts: 352
Re: Nicolette Shea
« Reply #559 on: April 19, 2017, 09:34:30 pm »
She dropped the last veil. Has an Eros Ad up for NYC.

Vern091

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 3335
  • -Receive: 1985
  • Posts: 1622
  • Ha Ha Ha Ha We love these Hoes
Re: Nicolette Shea
« Reply #560 on: April 19, 2017, 11:23:41 pm »
She dropped the last veil. Has an Eros Ad up for NYC.

Yes!! She's says on there many more scenes to come in the coming weeks and months from brazzers and other companies.

s2222

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 31
  • -Receive: 233
  • Posts: 134
Re: Nicolette Shea
« Reply #561 on: April 20, 2017, 12:15:35 am »
She dropped the last veil. Has an Eros Ad up for NYC.
she's had a lot before!

Walouu

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 1045
  • -Receive: 2095
  • Posts: 516
Re: Nicolette Shea
« Reply #562 on: April 20, 2017, 08:55:49 am »
























































La beauté atteinte par les seins de la femme n'était-elle point la gloire la plus resplendissante de l'évolution de l'humanité ?

Yasunari Kawabata

The Kid

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 69
  • -Receive: 159
  • Posts: 352
Re: Nicolette Shea
« Reply #563 on: April 20, 2017, 08:22:08 pm »
She dropped the last veil. Has an Eros Ad up for NYC.
she's had a lot before!

I and some others have known for at least two years that she was escorting. Previous Eros Ads used different names. NOW she is advertising as "Nicolette Shea ".

Since porn pays poorly compared to escorting it is likely that she is doing porn to boost her escort rates. Especially since she is working with Brazzers. No disrespect to them but it is not like she signed a contract with Vivid, Digital Playground or Wicked. I don't honestly know if any content producers have "contract gals " anymore. I DO know that when they did, escorting under "screen names " was frowned upon. Same as it was for PMOM's. A lot of people knew who was doing what including and especially Mr. Hefner ( MOST of his so-called "Girlfriends " were and still ARE available ). But he made it clear that it was in their interest to maintain plausible deniability by using "escort names" or better yet to be available UTR.

Goodeye

  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 9691
  • -Receive: 247641
  • Posts: 33026
Re: Nicolette Shea
« Reply #564 on: April 29, 2017, 11:44:32 am »









Makaveli21

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 1000
  • -Receive: 69
  • Posts: 182
Re: Nicolette Shea
« Reply #565 on: April 30, 2017, 02:20:10 am »
She dropped the last veil. Has an Eros Ad up for NYC.
she's had a lot before!

I and some others have known for at least two years that she was escorting. Previous Eros Ads used different names. NOW she is advertising as "Nicolette Shea ".

Since porn pays poorly compared to escorting it is likely that she is doing porn to boost her escort rates. Especially since she is working with Brazzers. No disrespect to them but it is not like she signed a contract with Vivid, Digital Playground or Wicked. I don't honestly know if any content producers have "contract gals " anymore. I DO know that when they did, escorting under "screen names " was frowned upon. Same as it was for PMOM's. A lot of people knew who was doing what including and especially Mr. Hefner ( MOST of his so-called "Girlfriends " were and still ARE available ). But he made it clear that it was in their interest to maintain plausible deniability by using "escort names" or better yet to be available UTR.

This is 100% true--her website now advertising her for $2000 a hour I'm pretty sure it was lower than that before the porn came out...

drmeto

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 132
  • -Receive: 752
  • Posts: 586
Re: Nicolette Shea
« Reply #566 on: April 30, 2017, 11:11:17 am »
She dropped the last veil. Has an Eros Ad up for NYC.
she's had a lot before!

I and some others have known for at least two years that she was escorting. Previous Eros Ads used different names. NOW she is advertising as "Nicolette Shea ".

Since porn pays poorly compared to escorting it is likely that she is doing porn to boost her escort rates. Especially since she is working with Brazzers. No disrespect to them but it is not like she signed a contract with Vivid, Digital Playground or Wicked. I don't honestly know if any content producers have "contract gals " anymore. I DO know that when they did, escorting under "screen names " was frowned upon. Same as it was for PMOM's. A lot of people knew who was doing what including and especially Mr. Hefner ( MOST of his so-called "Girlfriends " were and still ARE available ). But he made it clear that it was in their interest to maintain plausible deniability by using "escort names" or better yet to be available UTR.

This is 100% true--her website now advertising her for $2000 a hour I'm pretty sure it was lower than that before the porn came out...


If i remember correctly she wanted 1500/hour before she did Porn

zax

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 89
  • -Receive: 66
  • Posts: 59
Re: Nicolette Shea
« Reply #567 on: April 30, 2017, 03:20:50 pm »
Since porn pays poorly compared to escorting it is likely that she is doing porn to boost her escort rates. Especially since she is working with Brazzers. No disrespect to them but it is not like she signed a contract with Vivid, Digital Playground or Wicked. I don't honestly know if any content producers have "contract gals " anymore. I DO know that when they did, escorting under "screen names " was frowned upon. Same as it was for PMOM's. A lot of people knew who was doing what including and especially Mr. Hefner ( MOST of his so-called "Girlfriends " were and still ARE available ). But he made it clear that it was in their interest to maintain plausible deniability by using "escort names" or better yet to be available UTR.
This is 100% true--her website now advertising her for $2000 a hour I'm pretty sure it was lower than that before the porn came out...
I don't understand these girls, aren't they paid similar amounts per porn scene? So for the same money she does it with attractive professional male actor instead of some disgusting loser?

485US46

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 600
  • -Receive: 226
  • Posts: 189
Re: Nicolette Shea
« Reply #568 on: April 30, 2017, 04:22:09 pm »
I think commanding 2000 per scene as a freelancer for an extended period of time would be an extraordinary situation.
Nicolette may have been paid as much or possibly substantially more for her debut because she posed for some mags and had a following prior to shooting explicit, but for her to sustain these kinds of rate in today's climate, she would have to be very selective and cultivate her scarcity, which in turn would affect her bottom line.
Even if she opts to go all in, there is not that much content being shot anymore. And you may have to do some stuff that's pretty physical if you really want to draw everything you can from the porn market. And grind long hours as a feature dancer on the side.
Just topping 80K a year in earnings from video shoots is something a good majority of pornstars can't do. Because of her magazine looks, she probably could... for a time.

Whereas with hooking she can pile on gig after gig, the guys are older and none too hot but it's not as hard a work most of the time, and it will far exceed her porn earnings.
« Last Edit: April 30, 2017, 04:29:03 pm by 485US46 »

clj85

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 223
  • -Receive: 113
  • Posts: 85
Re: Nicolette Shea
« Reply #569 on: April 30, 2017, 04:35:05 pm »
Since porn pays poorly compared to escorting it is likely that she is doing porn to boost her escort rates. Especially since she is working with Brazzers. No disrespect to them but it is not like she signed a contract with Vivid, Digital Playground or Wicked. I don't honestly know if any content producers have "contract gals " anymore. I DO know that when they did, escorting under "screen names " was frowned upon. Same as it was for PMOM's. A lot of people knew who was doing what including and especially Mr. Hefner ( MOST of his so-called "Girlfriends " were and still ARE available ). But he made it clear that it was in their interest to maintain plausible deniability by using "escort names" or better yet to be available UTR.
This is 100% true--her website now advertising her for $2000 a hour I'm pretty sure it was lower than that before the porn came out...
I don't understand these girls, aren't they paid similar amounts per porn scene? So for the same money she does it with attractive professional male actor instead of some disgusting loser?

There´s a simple answer for that ;). Because there are no attractive professional male actors in porn. The industry is full of ugly douchebags who cant fuck. There maybe 5 Guys who deserve to be in Porn. The only reason for porn would be that its safer. But i would doubt that too.
« Last Edit: April 30, 2017, 04:46:34 pm by clj85 »