The Perfect Boobs Talk > General Discussion

What happened to the justbreastimplants forum?

<< < (2/2)

loose_cannon:

--- Quote from: unnaturalperfection on May 07, 2023, 06:19:11 pm ---
--- Quote from: smoothie4564 on May 06, 2023, 11:58:07 pm ---I am also curious to know what happened. I disliked how they completely banned men from participating on the forum, but it still had good content on there for lurkers.

--- End quote ---
This is a very female behavior, something about their gender craves exclusion

--- End quote ---

A reading of history would show that it’s actually the other way around.

For pretty much all of recorded European/Western history (as far back as Bronze Age Greece), women were confined by men to the domestic sphere. Even if they escaped the domestic sphere, wealthy and powerful men ensured that the places they conducted business and politics to make all the important decisions were both male-only and excluded the so-called “lower” classes. There are exceptions, e.g., Queen Boudicca, Joan of Arc but they are notable precisely because they are such rare historical anomalies. Gradually, over the last couple of centuries, people have been successful in breaking down these exclusionary barriers. I’m old enough to remember when golf clubs that the “great” and the powerful did their networking were legally prevented from excluding women.

From what little I’ve read of Asian history, it seems to have been a similar situation. Practices such as foot-binding ensured that women physically could not participate in society as the equal of men.

I wouldn’t feel at all miffed about women wanting a place where they can discuss cosmetic surgery amongst themselves.

1angryscot:

--- Quote from: loose_cannon on May 08, 2023, 10:02:02 pm ---
--- Quote from: unnaturalperfection on May 07, 2023, 06:19:11 pm ---
--- Quote from: smoothie4564 on May 06, 2023, 11:58:07 pm ---I am also curious to know what happened. I disliked how they completely banned men from participating on the forum, but it still had good content on there for lurkers.

--- End quote ---
This is a very female behavior, something about their gender craves exclusion

--- End quote ---

A reading of history would show that it’s actually the other way around.

For pretty much all of recorded European/Western history (as far back as Bronze Age Greece), women were confined by men to the domestic sphere. Even if they escaped the domestic sphere, wealthy and powerful men ensured that the places they conducted business and politics to make all the important decisions were both male-only and excluded the so-called “lower” classes. There are exceptions, e.g., Queen Boudicca, Joan of Arc but they are notable precisely because they are such rare historical anomalies. Gradually, over the last couple of centuries, people have been successful in breaking down these exclusionary barriers. I’m old enough to remember when golf clubs that the “great” and the powerful did their networking were legally prevented from excluding women.

From what little I’ve read of Asian history, it seems to have been a similar situation. Practices such as foot-binding ensured that women physically could not participate in society as the equal of men.

I wouldn’t feel at all miffed about women wanting a place where they can discuss cosmetic surgery amongst themselves.

--- End quote ---
You're hilariously woke, and entirely wrong.  Women do crave exclusion: historically they've consented to it.

randomrobin:

--- Quote from: 1angryscot on May 17, 2023, 03:11:57 am ---You're hilariously woke, and entirely wrong.  Women do crave exclusion: historically they've consented to it.

--- End quote ---

I hope this was meant to be role play or taken as a tongue in cheek joke, not something meant to be taken seriously. I think ownership style relationships are hot as fuck when it's done properly. However, there's a reason why people who practice BDSM go out of their way to make absolutely sure that their partner have given consent.

As much as tradwife and "1950s household" aesthetics and lifestyles are glamorized today, in history many of the woman who originally lived those lifestyles found themselves in situations were they could chose between taking physical abuse from their husbands or ending up destitute and homeless if they left. In those situations agency was taken away from the participants of those relationships and they were maintained by force and not through mutual consent. This "tradition" influenced historic political movements like early feminism and American prohibition. Those movements were partly motivated by desires to prevent physical abuse in "traditional" relationships.

In contemporary relationships it is rare if it gets that bad. However, if a relationship isn't mutually healthy for both partners it can turn toxic and can be a negative experience for everyone involved.

monsieurartois:

--- Quote from: phlalawyer on May 08, 2023, 08:25:41 pm ---The before and afters were legendary.

--- End quote ---

I heard this too, but never saw the protected photos, as I couldn't become an approved member there.  Perhaps one of the numerous men who posed as a woman to try and infiltrate that forum, got access and saved lots of photos, which they could share some here?  If not, I'm curious where else any of that content might be reposted nowadays. 

unnaturalperfection:

--- Quote from: randomrobin on May 18, 2023, 03:44:18 am ---.
--- End quote ---

You are describing social norms inside of relationships. What Scot and I have been saying is that women are the exclusionary gender. This is documented in studies and even the genome itself. 80% of our women ancestors reproduced, only 40% of men did. In societies of the past it was typical for high status men to have multiple women and low ranked men to have none. You may try to argue this was non-consensual, I'm sure some of the time it was. But much of the time the woman had a say as we see from the historical treatment of rapists.

Women are hardwired to exclude. Which somewhat fits the male desire to conquer -- but only if the man succeeds in beating the competition.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page