There is no moral argument. Unless your comments are actionable, they are moot. Unless the person is reading this forum and using it as a guide, it would not directly affect them. And if they are, the person has much greater issues at hand than an internet forum. How is that not obvious? Does virtue signaling cause blindness?
If there was a moral debate, morality is subjective so finding "who is right, who is wrong" is moot.
This site is a niche aspect involving human sexuality, which can be fetishized. It is not real. Often intentionally so. If you want to see real arguments on woke vs. moral in the battle of acceptance vs line-drawing, try fetlife.
Unactioned immoral comments, being moot, fit well with an internet forum that operates an an entertainment vice. It is not university. Calm your tits, bro.
Your post is a good example to illustrate what I believe is one of the matters at hand here: form of the content posted.
There is no need to say things like " the person has much greater issues at hand than an internet forum. How is that not obvious? Does virtue signaling cause blindness?" Why not say instead something like "I do not think that comments made on an anonymous forum affect wellbeing or people."
But posts on an anonymous Internet forum do affect people, after all, comments such as "real arguments on woke vs. moral in the battle of acceptance vs line-drawing, try fetlife." or "Does virtue signaling cause blindness?" show a visceral reaction from your part.
My point is then, to formulate what wants one to say in a more constructive way, or abstain directly if it won't lead to any productive discussion.
Instead of saying "If you want to see real arguments on woke vs. moral in the battle of acceptance vs line-drawing, try fetlife." , say "I don't this is the place for this kind of moral arguments, there are better placed suited for that, such as XYZ."
Instead of saying "It is not university. Calm your tits, bro."....I would just not say anything at all, because it's just unproductively confrontational.
Going back to what I think generated this thread: comments like "she looks like a fucking monster", "she ruined herself" and sometimes things like mentioning that the model has to get 999999 more procedures done to look good, I think those comments can either be avoided or rephrased.
Example: Instead of saying "Danielle Derek shouldn't have gone bigger and gotten her face all redone, she looks like a trashy plastic mess" I would phrase it "I loved how Danielle Derek looked with her previous implants, I really don't like her much now with bigger boobs."
Now, why should I make an effort in rephrasing or thinking what I post you may ask? Because 99.9% of the time there's no need for me to express my opinion (because comments like this are just that, opinions) denigrating someone else. First, because it doesn't give any satisfaction and second, since frankly no one should give a shit about my opinions but I'm typing them anyway, I might as well try and formulate it in a way that is constructive or at least is not unproductively confrontational.